International Emission Trading and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation and Sequestration
نویسنده
چکیده
The deployment of carbon capture and sequestration (CC&S) technologies is greatly affected by the marginal cost of controlling carbon emissions (also the value of carbon, when emissions permits are traded). Both the severity and timing of emissions limitations and the degree to which emissions limitation obligations can be traded will affect the value of carbon and thereby the timing and magnitude of CC&S technology deployment. Emissions limits that are more stringent in the near term imply higher nearterm carbon values and therefore encourage the local development and deployment of CC&S technologies. Trade in emissions obligations lowers the cost of meeting any regional or global emissions limit and so affects the rate of penetration of CC&S technologies. Trade lowers the marginal value of carbon in high cost regions and raises it in low cost regions. The net impact on the penetration of CC&S technologies depends on whether their increased use in low-cost regions exceeds the reduced use in high-cost regions. In the long term, CC&S technologies must deal with the issue of permanence. It is not the removal of the carbon from the waste-gas stream that prevents emissions; it is the sequestration of that carbon. If reservoirs are not permanent, then the emissions are merely displaced in time. Sequestration options vary in their permanence from carbon
منابع مشابه
The hedge value of international emissions trading under uncertainty
This paper estimates the value of international emissions trading, focusing on a here-to-fore neglected component; its value as a hedge against uncertainty. Much analysis has been done of the Kyoto Protocol and other potential international greenhouse gas mitigation policies comparing the costs of achieving emission targets with and without trading. These studies often show large cost reduction...
متن کاملInstitutional and legal issues of emissions trading
Emissions trading systems as a means of air pollution control have been developed in recent years to address some important limitations of traditional command and control environmental regulation. Trading systems address many of the inefficiencies of command systems and may promote cost-effectiveness by introducing flexibility and providing incentives for sources with lower control costs to und...
متن کاملContributing to the Mitigation of Climate Change Using Rangeland Management
Arational approach to responding to the uncertainty of climate change requires attention to both mitigation and adaptation activities. Mitigation, in contrast to adaptation, involves the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and enhancement of greenhouse gas sinks.1 The goal of mitigation is to stabilize atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent human interference ...
متن کاملSoil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas mitigation in Agriculture
Agriculture, Forest and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector contributes about a quarter of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emission [1] though its contribution is small in Japan [2]. In addition, technologies to reduce GHGs from agriculture sector are not expensive [3]. It is therefore worth reducing GHGs from this sector. It includes soil carbon (C) sequestration and mitigation of methane (CH4) and Nitr...
متن کاملThe Costs and Benefits of Integrating Non-Annex I Countries in International Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Systems
One of the main mechanisms for implementing international Climate Change policies is the establishment of a carbon offset market that allows the transfer of emission reductions between countries. The rationale for this policy instrument, which is recognised in the Kyoto Protocol, is to facilitate global cost efficiency in climate change mitigation through a cost efficient allocation of reductio...
متن کامل